Science is not Truth.
Science is a means by which
Truth may be discovered.
Science is not the foundation of the Universe.
Science is a field of study that explores and examines the Universe as a way for Awareness to gain Understanding. Refer to the post, The Human Consciousness Model.
The view of Science as being at the heart of the Universe leads to a warped perspective of Science, it creates a worship of Science. It turns Science into a dogmatic religion that must be believed and never questioned, with its practitioners becoming priests; rather than Science being correctly recognised as a potentially valuable tool for the seekers of Truth.
But a tool is only as useful as its foundational creation allows for and its outcomes are dependent on the quality and competence of those that adhere to its strict methodologies.
Misunderstanding this tool will achieve distorted perspectives, which could lead to catastrophic outcomes.
Misuse of this tool, intentionally or not, may have equally disastrous ramifications should the allure and seduction of its potential not be countered by the balancing nature of Wisdom.
If the wielders of Science come to opinions that do not fully align with the True reality of the Universe, then it is not up to the Universe to conform to the Science. Universe cares nothing about these misunderstandings. The Universe will continue on as it is and the abusers of Science will eventually reap the consequences of their ignorance and arrogance.
Science has its limitations, one of which is, that it cannot explore areas where Awareness has not yet reached.
If the Scientific understanding is superficial,
then the Scientific solutions offered,
are also superficial.
An example of this is pain killing drugs. Pain killing drugs are based on Scientific understanding, but pain killers do little to resolve the cause of pain. All they do is mask it and possibly add their own unwanted side effects.
A second limitation of Science is, a Scientifically valid solution does not automatically equate to an appropriate solution.
One may treat 100 Individuals suffering from chronic pain with a bullet to the head and claim a 100% success rate in curing these Individuals from pain. Ignoring the mass murder component, this is Scientifically valid. 100% of people treated with this protocol, are no longer experiencing any pain.
Ah! Wonderful Science.
At best, all that Science can really establish, is that Action A will result in Outcome B. It makes no determination on whether Action A is appropriate for a particular situation, or whether Outcome B is appropriate for a particular situation.
One is to determine this for their own specific requirements and circumstance.
Another limitation of Science is that it can only explore the tangible world, the world of the Algorithm, it cannot reach the realm of Consciousness. Its scope is limited to the expressions of Consciousness, because itself is an expression of Consciousness.
For Science to be able to explore Consciousness directly, it would need to exist outside of Consciousness, which is just not possible. Refer to the posts The Infinity Of Singularity and Foundation Of Duality.
The path toward Consciousness runs parallel with Awareness for a time, but the road for Science eventually reaches the Threshold of the Abyss, which it cannot cross and must therefore be left behind, if Awareness is to reunite with its Source.
Real Science Endeavours to
Discover and Confirm Truth.
Contrived Science Serves
a Political Agenda of
Control and Manipulation.
Scientific experiments isolate a particular aspect of Creation, to study it and gain Understanding of it. Often, the Subject of that study is taken out of its natural environment so variables can be more easily controlled and their influence more accurately measured.
However, all this does is show how the Subject behaves in this isolated situation, it does not necessarily show how the Subject behaves in its natural environment.
Consider an Individual interacting with a group of their closest friends. Now also consider that same Individual being placed amongst a group of complete strangers. From One’s own personal experiences, it can be easily deduced that this Individual will behave differently amongst their friends, than they would amongst strangers.
It is logical to expect that their behaviour will differ. This is natural, different surroundings will evoke different behaviours.
This variation in behaviour holds true for all things.
Scientifically studying Subjects out of Context, will not necessarily give real insight into their true nature.
So, scientists may claim that their theories and experiments are accurate and valid, but are they really?
